Divided

We have spent the last couple of weeks describing Paul’s posture as he writes to the church at Corinth. He certainly takes a high view of them. It is not because of their actions, rather it is because God is faithful. Since the church belongs to Christ, he is sure that they will end strong.

In this week’s text, Paul addresses one of the key issues in the church. He describes the church as divided. The word he uses is schizō. We derive the english word Schizophrenia from this expression. The word literally means a splitting or tearing apart (Louw-Nida Lexicon). Paul explains what this looks like. The church has divided into four factions; each one claiming a leader. One interesting fact about this word (schizō) is that it is a political word in Greek culture. It describes rival parties in the political process. Paul is describing four parties or groups. I wonder if each group had its own logo. We see the Paul party, the Apollos party, the Cephas (Peter) party, and the Christ party. Paul is disgusted by the result of this division.

Paul urges the church to be perfectly united (katērtismenoi) instead of divided (schizō). This word (katērtismenoi) has to do with being knit together. The word is used to describe the disciple’s nets being repaired. Nets full of holes do little good. Yet, when they are put back together, they are able to accomplish their task.

Too often we form these sorts of factions in the church. Be it music styles, personality traits, ministry philosophies, or political preferences, we like to form groups. We rally around a leader, buy the T-shirt, and become a fan. We are ready for battle; we like to point out the weaknesses of rival groups. It can morph into a form of entertainment. Yet, this sort of behavior destroys, erodes, and shifts our attention away from the cross. Join us on Sunday as we explore this dynamic in the church at Corinth.

  1. Wednesday, Jul 20

    Susan Londt

    I think this same thing is happening in politics in our country. No matter where you stand, if you support the President or you didn’t vote for him, the media is so slanted in their reporting (either for or against) that they are forcing people to choose a camp and jump into it. Maybe I’ve been blinded to it before, but I’ve never felt such divisions. It’s to the point that I don’t want to reveal my political leanings for fear of scrutiny by someone in the other “camp”. At least that is the atmosphere on campus.

    • Sunday, Jul 24

      wadeallen

      How true. We need to talk more about issues, less about the leaders. It seems that some blindly follow a particular party without thinking about the issues. It is much easier to do that; it doesn’t require you to think too much.

Leave a comment

Blog Posts